Oakland Legalization Drive Has Shot at Ballot
Supporters of a campaign to legalize marijuana for recreational
use in Oakland, Calif., said they have the required signatures to
get the initiative on the November ballot, the Oakland Tribune reported
June 22.
According to the Oakland Civil Liberties Alliance, more than 32,000
signatures have been obtained, 12,000 more than the number required
to get the Oakland Cannabis Initiative on the ballot.
Officials in the City Clerk's Office said the signatures must be
certified before the proposal can be placed before voters.
"It makes us feel really good and confident that we're headed
to the ballot in November," said Alliance member Joe DeVries.
While the measure wouldn't decriminalize marijuana in the city
unless recreational use of the drug is legalized by the state, it
would prompt the city to examine ways to tax and regulate sales
if and when legalization occurs.
The measure also would require the Oakland Police Department to
treat the private adult use of marijuana as its lowest priority.
Police officials dispute the alliance's claim that legalizing marijuana
would be beneficial to the city. "It's not going to solve all
the problems they say it's going to solve," said Oakland police
narcotics Lt. Rick Hart. "How much would it cost in stores?
How difficult will it be to get it? There's still going to be a
black market if it's too expensive in the store and you can get
it for less on the street."
Hart added that children would still be able to obtain the drug.
"You'll still have the under-21 folks interested in purchasing
it, and where are they going to get it? Because stores would presumably
be carding, young people couldn't get it there and would still buy
it on the street. So you won't have less dealers. As long as it's
a lucrative business on the street, it's gonna be out there,"
he said.
Hart also noted that personal adult use of marijuana already is
a low priority in the city. "If we stop someone and they have
less than an ounce, if they have one joint in the car, they only
get a citation anyway," he said. "Even now, we're not
handcuffing people and taking them to jail for that. So the only
thing that would change would be the amount they could have."
|